Topic: Closing the allergen data gap between recipe management systems and POS menus.
Why it matters: SB-68 compliance requires allergen data to be accurate and consistent everywhere it appears. Gaps between internal recipe systems and guest-facing menus are among the most common—and preventable—fail points.
Key action: Align recipe, POS, and digital menu systems to ensure that every allergen change flows automatically and traceably from supplier to guest.
SB-68 (the ADDE Act) turns allergen disclosure into a matter of record, not interpretation. Yet one of the most frequent compliance risks is the data gap between recipe systems and POS menus. The kitchen holds the truth, but the guest-facing menu doesn’t reflect it. Closing that gap ensures allergen data is accurate, current, and defensible during inspection.
Where the allergen data gap begins
In many foodservice operations, recipe, POS, and digital menu systems are separate silos. The recipe management platform stores the true allergen data, but menu and POS systems often display static or manually edited text that isn’t automatically updated when recipes change.
| System | Primary Purpose | Typical User | Allergen Data Source | Risk if Disconnected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recipe Management System | Holds official ingredient specs, nutrition, and allergen mapping. | Culinary, R&D, QA | Supplier data synced or entered manually. | Allergen data is accurate but not visible on guest menus. |
| POS / Menu Platform | Displays item names, prices, and allergen labels to guests. | Marketing, Digital, Site Managers | Manual entry or partial import from recipe system. | Outdated or incomplete allergen info reaches customers. |
| Ordering Apps / QR Menus | Customer-facing menus with allergen icons or disclosures. | Digital / IT Teams | Feeds from POS or website CMS. | Guests see inconsistent allergen data across channels. |
Compliance consequence: “reasonable knowledge” breaks when data diverges
SB-68’s key standard requires that operators disclose allergens they “know or reasonably should know” are in their menu items. If accurate allergen data exists inside your recipe system but isn’t displayed publicly, regulators can argue that you reasonably should have known your menus were inaccurate. The data existed — it simply wasn’t shared consistently.
How to close the recipe-to-menu gap
- Integrate systems: Connect recipe and POS systems so allergen data flows automatically with every update.
- Lock allergen fields: Prevent manual edits in POS — verified data must originate from the recipe system.
- Use version control: Record every menu republish and verify that updates appear across print and digital formats.
- Run periodic audits: Compare live menus against recipe data monthly to identify mismatches before inspections.
- Train both teams: Culinary ensures data accuracy; digital ops ensures visibility — compliance depends on both.
Example: automated synchronization in action
When a supplier reformulates a sauce to include soy, the recipe system updates automatically. That change pushes to the POS and digital menus, which republish overnight with updated allergen callouts. Every update is logged with a timestamp and change ID — creating a clear, defensible audit trail. No spreadsheets, no emails, no missed updates.
Key takeaway
SB-68 compliance relies on the integrity and visibility of allergen data. If your recipe and menu systems don’t communicate, you’re operating with a silent liability. Integration not only simplifies compliance — it safeguards your reputation and protects guests in real time.
California Senate Bill 68 (ADDE Act) requires written allergen disclosure for all menu items in covered food facilities by July 1, 2026.
Ready to connect recipe data with your menus?
Discover how integrated digital systems eliminate allergen data gaps, ensuring consistency, accuracy, and defensibility under SB-68.
See integration examples Ask an expert View official legislation